Thursday, January 13, 2011

Is there more funk in Felton Road?

One of the first Kiwi Pinots I fell in love with was Felton Road so it's interesting to see how the wine has evolved since the winery went biodynamic (it was Demeter certified in 2009)

They have 5 cuvées now all of which I tasted at the New Zealand tasting this week. The standout one for me was the Block 3 which had a simply glorious purity of fruit. It's also (unfortunately) the most expensive at up to £51.75 (The Sampler)

The Block 5 (£40.40 at Slurp) was very impressive too - intense, rich and textured though still quite closed and I also enjoyed the Cornish Point which had some lovely fruit and an attractive freshness though possibly a little light for a £33 wine. Hard to tell at this age.

It was the two other 'entry level' pinots (if £25-£35 can be called an entry level price point) that exhibited the funkiness: the 2009 Bannockburn Pinot Noir (dark, earthy, quite rustic) and the Calvert (big, ripe, slightly chewy tannins, 'animal' my tasting notes say). And you just wonder how they'll age which you're entitled to expect they should at that price.

I remember buying some Felton Road (the 2003 Block 5, I think) while it was still an affordable £17 or so and finding it acquired increasing funkiness over the following four to five years. You wouldn't want a whole lot more on either the Bannockburn or the Calvert.

It's also interesting to speculate, following our previous debate, the effect of the biodynamic calendar on the way the wines were tasting. It turned out to be a leaf day . . . Readmore »»

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Inaugural Episode of Wine For Normal People Radio: Varieties v. Varietals -- Which Is It?

Drumroll please....

If you follow me on Facebook, you know that I've said that Wine For Normal People is going multimedia in 2011...and I've wasted no time!

Please check out the inaugural episode of the Wine For Normal People podcast, available at winefornormalpeople.podbean.com AND through iTunes! Or click here to download the MP3 and listen now!

What's the podcast about? It's a weekly 20 to 25 minute look into a basic wine topic with co-host Rick Breslin, a wine/tech enthusiast, and co-founder of Hello Vino, a free mobile wine application that assists wine consumers with recommendations on pairings, and provides lots of basic information about wine flavor profiles and how to pick wine based on your taste preferences.

Every week we're going to talk about wine and address topics that other wine podcasts may not even think to talk about (because they just assume everyone knows, of course). The first show: Is it varieties or varietals? And what does that mean anyway?

Check it out...and stay tuned for this week's topic, due out Friday: How do I pick a good wine? (amorphous, no? Comes from a real Tweet that was sent to Hello Vino and is a question I get all the time too! We break it down, so don't miss it!).

Oh, and please don't tell me I have a face for radio : ) Readmore »»

New Zealand winemakers aim to be 20% organic by 2020

Big news from the New Zealand wine tasting yesterday. The organisation that represents organic wine growers Organic Winegrowers New Zealand (OWNZ) has announced that it has set a target that 20% of New Zealand wineries should be organic and biodynamic by 2020.

Currently only 1,500 hectares of vines are managed organically – 4.5% of New Zealand’s total. The goal is supported by the main industry association New Zealand Winegrowers which has already signed a joint memorandum with the OWNZ to promote organic production and has its own sustainability programme with which any producer who wants to get an export licence will have to comply by next year. (You can read more about it here and here.)

The development puts New Zealand back at the forefront of the debate about sustainable viticulture which it occupied back in the 90s although it was interesting that some of the principal protagonists such as Rippon, Millton and Seresin weren't present at yesterday's tasting. Nor was Mission Estate which according to this report on the New Zealand website Scoop is running an interesting trial that compares organic and conventionally treated vineyards side by side. Readmore »»

Monday, January 10, 2011

An Amazing South African Syrah and the Contrast with a Less Amazing Cali Shiraz...A Cool Experiment

The other night MC Ice and I were cold. We needed something to warm us up. So we popped open a bottle of Syrah from South Africa that I'd been sent a while back (there's my disclosure, but as usual free wine doesn't guarantee a good review!). Because we're just so wild and crazy, we had another bottle of Shiraz from California (same grape, different name, and this was ALSO sent to me) and decided to do a little taste test. I don't want to be bitchy about this, but I've got a serious peeve where this wine is concerned. I hear it mispronounced ALL the time, so I want to clear it up here and ask that you PLEASE remember this, if nothing else from this post:

1. Syrah and Shiraz are different names for the same grape.
2. It is NOT Sy-RAZ or Sha-rah. PLEASE don't call it either of those things.
3. It's Syrah (See-RAH) or Shiraz (Shah-RAZ).

Ok, with that off my chest, some other important things....

Syrah is always the name in France, where the grape is originally from and where the flavors are more like savory herbs, black pepper, and horse farm (just trust me on this one and then get a bottle to sniff so you know what I mean!). Shiraz is always the name of the grape in Australia where the wines taste like blackberries with warm spices like cinnamon and nutmeg, and have secondary flavors like dark, wet soil.

In other parts of the world nomenclature is kind of weird. Producers use Syrah when they want to indicate a French style and Shiraz when they want to indicate an Australian style -- you'll see both used in Californian and South African wines, so just know it's all the same grape and the term used on the bottle is a tip off to the style.


Because I've gone into a lot of detail on California in prior posts, and because I've gone into detail on the producer, Concannon, in another post, I'm going to talk about the South African Mullineux from a semi-obscure area called Swartland, in the northwestern Cape area.


I make no excuses and don't try to hide my love for South Africa. I was there a few years ago and was fascinated by the beauty of the place, the kindness of the people, and the EXCELLENT food and wine. I'm pulling for the wines of South Africa to keep on keeping on -- improving quality and becoming more prominent players on the world wine scene.

The thing I think a lot people don't know about South Africa is that the country has been churning out wine since it was colonized in the 1650s. Because of that, there's been much debate about whether it is considered Old World (which right now is an exclusive European club) or New World (everywhere that isn't Europe). It's been classified New World both for stylistic reasons (it's fruitier and more bold in flavor than European wines) and for the fact that the political woes of South Africa (apartheid) put winemaking back nearly 100 years and now the country is tenaciously and aggressively trying to recover from its setback. Given the overhaul and modernization required by the industry, many New World winemaking techniques and ideas have permeated, so I think the whole debate on New v. Old World has been settled by the powers that be.

Regardless, the country makes good wine. And all its street cred comes from areas
near the southernmost tip of Africa, the Cape of Good Hope. You may have heard of places like Stellenbosch, Franschoek, Elgin, or Walker Bay, where the wine critics who like to put arbitrary numbers on wine quality (oops, did I say that?) have concentrated their tasting. These places do make great wine and as time goes on they are only bound to improve. But there are some more remote areas that have great wine history too that we may want to keep an eye on...and Swartland (to which none of my texts have given much credence) is one of them.

40 minutes north of the breathtaking end of the world, Cape
Town (yes this is a picture from my haul up the back of Table Mountain, which involved scaling rock face, climbing up rickety ladders, and squirming up tenuous chains, but that's a story for another time...), is the giant bread basket of South Africa: Swartland. It's known as "blackland" because in the summer the green foliage turns black due to lack of water.

This place is no stranger to wine...or to civilization. According to the cave paintings (and to the
Mullineux web site!), bushmen lived here 150,000 years ago, farming the rich, fertile land. About 2000 years ago, the nomadic Khoi-Khoi came in and brought with them sheep and cattle. And 350 years ago Europeans came from the Southern Cape in search of meat and a place to grow oats, wheat, barley, etc., which was greatly lacking in the Cape's windy, maritime climate. Like every sad colonization story, the Khoi-Khoi freely traded with the Europeans, until eventually the latter took over the water supplies and farmlands and forced out the nomads.

But leaving aside all that cultural and political stuff, we're here to talk about wine. And the key to this story is that from very early on, as soon as Europeans set up settlement in Swartland, they also began viticulture. Although it took a backseat to more important stuff like growing grains and raising sheep and cows, little pockets cropped up and grapes were turned into wine.

Fast forward to more modern times and bam! a revolution has taken place in this area. As it
turns out, Swartland is great for growing grains, but less great for viticulture. Producers have to carefully select sites to get good raw material for wine. The area is surrounded by mountains, and the soils from those mountains have provided an excellent environment, but don't look for Swartland to be a huge volume producer of great wine any time soon. The good areas are limited. That said, a few amazing producers have decided to try their hand at making high quality wines using amazing, old school techniques.

For instance, many do what's called dry farming here. What's that? Really just old-school farming -- you don't irrigate and you leave it to nature to provide water sources for the vines. What does that mean? Instead of shallow roots that have consistent access to water from drip irrigation (hoses that kind of leak water to the vines on a regular basis), the roots of these vines have to go way down deep to access water. The yields are low from these vines and they struggle -- a good thing in the wine world. Instead of being trained on trellises, the better producers also grow these vines in bushes, a very old method of growing vines that ripens vines slowly but well in warm, dry climates like Swartland (left). All these old school methods are also used in the Northern Rhone Valley of France, where the famous native red grape, Syrah, is king. And this grape takes the crown with the top producers in Swartland like Sadie Family Vineyards, the only Biodynamic producer in the area.

A word on Mullineux before I review the wine -- it's a pretty new property, started in 2007 by a husband and wife team near a mountain called Riebeck Kasteel. The Winery is laser focused on making just three wines -- a white blend, a straw wine (sweet wine, the grapes raisin on straw mats or some other method, and then you press out mostly sugar to get a sweet treat!), and Syrah.

Mullineux is minimalist in farming and they don't believe in a lot of winemaker monkeying, as I like to say. They rely on grapes, not oak, for primary flavors and the wines are unfiltered and unfined, which doesn't mean there's chunks of grape floating in them, but more that flavor is retained because the wine isn't subjected to clarification, which some believe strips out and homogenizes flavors.


I'll provide the review below, but for fun and illustration of the differences, I'm going to add an extra section, which is how it compared to the Concannon Shiraz. This wine is 3 times the price of the California wine but probably 10 or 15 times the quality. I don't think there is always a direct correlation between price and quality, but in this case, yeah, it is in a BIG way.


The Wine:
Mullineux Syrah
Where It's From: Swartland, South Africa
The Grapes: 100% Syrah
Vintage:
2008
Price:
$29.99

Color:
With the risk of grossing you out, I'll say that the wine is so dark that it's like looking at a blood bag. Pigment galore - it was nearly opaque but still had a nice pink, watery edge. All this sounds ick, but a Syrah with this much richness, at minimum, indicates lots of fruity ripeness. This is pretty common color in warmer regions, where the sun allows the grapes lots of ripeness and pigment development.

Smell: If I may be slightly judgmental for a second, I wasn't expecting that much from this wine. Swartland is warm, there aren't a ton of producers from the area, and I was concerned this would be like an expensive Livingston Cellars, from Cali's Central Valley.

I'll admit it: I'm a chump. This wine was complex, intense, and many splendored! It smelled more lik
e a Rhone Syrah than an Australian one -- leather, horse hair, and black pepper were more prominent than the ripe plum, and blackberry aromas. This is so obscure, but there's this smell of damp wood or marine air that I associate with older apartments in San Francisco (if you've smelled it, you know what I mean) -- I smelled that here. If that is completely out there, just think of damp wood, and dark, dry soil. Oh yeah, and deliciousness.

Taste: The wine was fruitier than expected -- lots of sour blackberry juice with a raisin/prune flavor. That barnyard, horsey smell kind of melded with the fruit and was complex (think a cheese that's a little funky) and gooooood! A little peppercorn and a baked bread flavor were on the finish -- super unique and savory. It had a little bit of an alcohol burn but the mouth-drying tannins were in check and everything was in great balance. This wine had a ton of character and stuck around long after I swallowed it.

Food: Because this wine is so complex, you'll need something a little simpler to go up against it.
Hard cheeses like Parmesan or something flavorful like Gorgonzola would benefit from the spicy, earthy flavors of the wine. If you go light on the marinade and just do a vinaigrette with salt and fresh pepper, then grilled meats or veggies would be an ideal match. Heavy meat and a peppercorn rub = good things with this wine. Grilled portabella mushrooms, another hit.

Drink or Down the Sink?:
Drink, drink, drink! What a nice, bold wine. I was thoroughly impressed by how multi-faceted this was and how it resembled French more than Australian wine.

Comparison with Concannon: Concannon's wine is called Shiraz, so I expected more unabashed fruit flavors than the restraint shown in the Mullineux wine. But from the get-go I knew I was wrong. The watery, lighter color didn't indicate a bolder wine. The grapey aroma was nothing like the rich, horsey, woodsy, black plum scents in the Mullineux. The Concannon also smelled to me like it was going to be watery -- there wasn't a whole lot going on. This isn't like most Shiraz I've had and it was quite the opposite of the depth and complexity of the Mullineux.

In contrast to the multi-layered flavors of the South African wine, the Concannon Shiraz reminded me of (I'm going to take you back or stretch your imagination if you don't know what this is) Hubba Bubba
Blueberry flavored chewing gum. There was a touch of black pepper and a bit of mouth drying tannin, but this wine was just light plum fruit with some alcohol -- it seemed like the flavor was baked out of the grapes in the hot Cali sun and the vines may be in soils that aren't the best for the grape. Regardless of reason, the wine lacked all the nuance I found in the South African Syrah. The Concannon was palatable, and had characteristics of the Syrah/Shiraz grape, but when stacked up against the Mullineux, it paled.

Doing a "taste test" like this is fascinating and I'd recommend it to you so you can see for yourself how diverse regions can make a big difference in aroma, flavor, and overall deliciousness. It also helps you learn the range of flavors a grape has, and kind of the "bones" of the operation -- what it seems to always have in common.


What did I learn from this excuse for drinking a lot of Shiraz? I like complexity in my
Syrah/Shiraz. Fruit alone is not enough for me -- I like the funk (horse, pepper, dirt) that the grape can possess. So, hot areas without diversity in soil types for me aren't going to do it. I will always maintain that quality is not always driven by price, but I do think it's driven by where the grapes are grown and I think super fertile areas like the San Francisco Bay/Livermore Valley are not at the top of my list when I shop for Syrah/Shiraz.

Comment on this post and let me know what you discover!

Readmore »»

Sunday, January 9, 2011

The Spanish natural wine scene


So far French wines have dominated this blog simply because they are more readily available in the UK and I spend more time in France than anywhere else. I was also under the impression that there wasn't much interest in natural winemaking in Spain but I was obviously wrong.

According to Jancis Robinson’s exemplary website there are some exciting wines emerging including her wine of the week this week, Picarana from Bodega Marañones. She also highlights a number from Indigo Wine in a feature which is only available to subscribers so I’m not going to queer her pitch by referring to the wines or tasting notes. You’ll have to subscribe (which I strongly recommend) - or wait till I’ve had a chance to taste them - to get some feedback from me.

The only wine I’ve tasted recently - apart from the Rioja I tried with Kate Thal - which really falls under the scope of this blog is Los Pinos 0% (above) from Dominio Los Pinos in Valencia which has been organic for some 20 years. It’s a dark, slightly tarry blend of Garnacha (20%) Monastrell (40%) and Syrah (40%) with, as the name suggests, no added sulphur. It’s on the rustic side with smoky bonfire aromas and firm, slightly stalky tannins - a wine that really needs food (wild boar comes to mind) to kick it into touch. Well made - It certainly didn’t suffer from the lack of sulphur - but for me it lacked the edgy excitment of some of the natural wines I’ve tasted from France lately.

Another winemaker Fabio Bartolomei of Vinos Ambiz also spotted that there was no links section for natural Spanish wines so I’ve remedied that. Unfortunately the blogs and sites of the producers he mentions are all, barring his, in Spanish but if you speak the language check them out:

Laureano Serres  
Samuel Cano   
Alfredo Maestro   
Vinya Sanfeliù   

You can find more on the Vino Naturales site - again in Spanish - here 

He also drew my attention to this very interesting map which shows that there are more artisanal producers (not sure how that is defined) in the south west corner of France than in any region of Spain. But obviously that’s changing. If you know of any I should try please let me know. Readmore »»

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Do fruit and root days really affect how a wine tastes?


It’s taken me a while to get round to posting again as I’ve been preoccupied with the issue of tasting days - more particularly the issue of whether a wine made in the southern hemisphere according to one biodynamic calendar would taste as well as one made to a northern hemisphere calendar tasted on the same day.

For those of you who are not familiar with the concept Steiner divides the calendar into four types of days - flower, fruit, root and leaf of which flower and fruit are supposed to be best for tasting. Flower brings out the aromatics, fruit the, er, fruit.

Obviously the timings will differ slightly between northern and southern hemisphere. The bible for the former is When Wine Tastes Best by Maria and Matthias Thun which is available as a booklet (£3.99 Floris Books) and as an iPod and iPad download. (Brian Keats is the Antipodean guru according to Julian Castagna, below)

We tasted a couple of wines over the Christmas holiday and found our impression of them varied from day to day but not specially according to the calendar. One for example, the Insolite I wrote about the other day, had been open for 24 hours in a half empty bottle by the time we tasted it the second day, surely a far more important factor?

Many retailers now try to organise their tastings on fruit and root days but are they right to do so when the wines may have come from different time zones? I asked a number of winemakers, retailers and wine writer Beverley Blanning who has recently written an excellent introduction to biodynamic winemaking Biodynamics in Wine for their views.

The general consensus was that biodynamic calendars are an imprecise science but most agree that wines do indeed taste different on fruit days if for different reasons.

Julian Castagna of Castagna vineyards in Beechworth, Victoria bore out Blanning’s own view that it’s where you, the taster, are that counts not where the wine was made.

"The only thing I know for sure is that I seem less able to make value judgments on some days - it was a revelation when I worked out that these moments always occurred on root days. I suspect that this is probably more the effect of the moon on my body rather than on the wine [an opinion] but understanding that fact has removed much doubt [confusion] from my winemaking. So I guess my opinion is that it is the influence of the moon where you are that makes the difference not where the wine was made."

Vanya Cullen of Cullen Wines in Australia's Margaret River actually suggested that it was the ‘live’ quality of biodynamic wines makes them respond better than other wines to changes in environment

“I don’t think it would make any difference where they are tasted as the wines are alive and respond to the energies around them In fact it would be a reason why wines made in this way could look better with travel around the globe.”

Doug Wregg of Caves de Pyrène which has many natural wines in its portfolio reckons on the other hand that the more ‘natural’ wines are the more they are likely to respond to the biodynamic calendar:

"We've been doing quality control assessments after major (and smaller) tastings for several years now and the wines appear to taste better on fruit and flower days. They can also, however, taste fine on other days. I suspect that the wines that will vary most will be the most natural wines as they are the most "living wines" with still-active yeasts. We find these wines blossom or close down dramatically according to the day.

However, there are a whole bunch of factors you have to throw in to the mix: 1. weather 2. the condition of the wines themselves and 3, the palate and mood of the taster. Wines definitely show better when there is high pressure and when the sun is shining. Secondly, bottle variation is a factor when it comes to assessing wines. Finally, our palate is never exactly the same on two days, nor are the conditions of tastings identical no matter how precisely they are copied."

 
Randall Grahm of Bonny Doon in California holds a similar view:

"I would pour (all things being equal) on a fruit day where the tasting is to take place. I have certainly noted some differences between the way a wine will show on a fruit vs. a leaf day (the two most striking comparisons), but honestly, I think that there are other phenomena that may well have a effect that are more dramatic - certainly rising barometric pressure seems to show most wines off to better advantage."
 
And echoes Wregg’s comments about mood:

"There are also some days when people just seem happier, more satisfied with themselves, the world - I'm not quite sure what this correlates to - and on those days, sure enough, the wine does seem to show better.  My own rather anecdotal, skewed experience is that on a given day, reds will show better than whites and then vice-versa."

Beverley Blanning agrees:

"In my own experience, I have found that the choice of wine will have considerable bearing on the impact of the calendar.  For example, leaf days seem to be less of a problem for whites than for reds.  The day of the launch of the BD monograph [her booklet] was a leaf day.  We had a tasting of four whites and four reds.  I asked the attendees (who didn't know it was a leaf day) what they thought of the wines.  Their views concurred with mine, namely that the whites were all good (especially the 'leafy' Sauvignon Blanc), but that the reds were variable.  

One person noted that the only red that really didn't taste good was the Pinot Noir and others agreed.  On the other hand, the Cabernet Sauvignon was fine. Burgundian biodynamic growers have told me that the worst possible day to taste Pinot is a leaf day - for obvious reasons. Leafiness is highly undesirable in Pinot, but far more acceptable (at least to many of us) in Cabernet Sauvignon and a good number - or even most - white wines."   

All fascinating stuff. I also wonder about the question of expectation. If you know it’s a leaf day do you steel yourself for disappointment - or expect the wines to be show well on a fruit day which could be a self-fulfilling prophecy? How significant is it if the wines have been decanted - rare in a retailer’s tasting? Or, failing that, how long the bottles have been open? And in a domestic situation where you’re drinking rather than tasting, the food you’re eating is obviously going to play a part.

Do tell me what you think. Readmore »»

Monday, January 3, 2011

A Phenomenal, Not-So-Well-Known-But-Outstanding Mendocino Gem: Navarro Vineyards

So I start the year with an end...an end to the series on California wineries. I've enjoyed delving into Sonoma and Napa, but I'm also looking forward to returning on the never ending exploration of wines around the world. I give total props to those who blog exclusively on Cali, but I personally have too much wine A.D.D. and travel wanderlust to stay committed to one area (plus, I really love dorking out on the history of wine regions and although I adore our winelands in the US, the story is short and not so dramatic. I want the drama!).

Today we end with a real bang and talk about a phenomenal, not-so-well-known-but-outstanding gem in Mendocino: Navarro Vineyards.

Mendocino is a large area just north of Sonoma. It has a lot of
characteristics that I love in a wine region. For starters, it's super green. According to the Mendocino Winegrape and Wine Commission, 28% of the grapes grown are either organic or biodynamic (check out my post on what this means if you are interested!). 71% of the vineyards are Fish Friendly (meaning they don't have runoff into streams and rivers, disturbing habitats). The area is the home of the first organic winery and the first Biodynamic winery in the US (both titles go to Frey Vineyards). One-third of all organic grapes grown in California are from Mendocino. Pretty damn good if you ask me.

Another plus for Mendocino is the diversity of the area. There are two main regions and they
each produce vastly different wine types because they have vastly different climates. A mountain range divides the area into the cool, maritime climate of the west and the hotter more continental climate of the east. From a wine perspective, it may as well be two completely different areas of the world given the weather conditions.

Lots of wine is grown in the hot eastern area, but much of the praise for Mendocino goes to it's western flank where the fog off the Navarro River and from the Pacific Ocean creates a cool climate that produces amazing Pinot Noir and Chardonnay, and even (rare for Cali) Gewurztraminer and Riesling, which require really cold climates to thrive and taste good.


Within the western area is the most famous AVA (American Viticultural Area), Anderson Valley. It's known for being one of the coolest areas in California for winegrape growing and this place is not some crap area. The very esteemed and famous Louis Roederer (think Cristal) looked for decades to find a place in California with a climate similar enough to Champagne to warrant investment. Whereas some of the House's counterparts sought to make a go of it in the cool Carneros region in southern Napa/Sonoma (it spans both regions), Roederer planted a flag firmly in Anderson Valley, and others followed (I would have reviewed Roederer's wines, but they were closed when we swung by!).


If I haven't peaked your interest in discovering a little about Mendocino, I'll say one more thing. This area is like what Sonoma and Napa were like 25 or 30 years ago. It consists mainly of family farmers who make wine for the love of the land and of the juice. Although you can still find this in Sonoma (and I have posted plenty of examples) and (sometimes) Napa, Mendocino wineries seem less concerned with financial targets and more concerned with farming. And the wines are an amazing value.


I happened upon Navarro Vineyards years ago on my first trip to wine country. When I visited
tasting rooms in Sonoma I asked every person that I thought knew a little something about wine what their favorite winery was, and Navarro came up about 3 or 4 times in 8 wineries. I thought it would be all hype, but there's something to all this referral business!

Navarro is a family operation that has been around since 1974. As they say on their site, you won't find them in your local wine shop (unless you live in California) but their direct-to-consumer prices are so competitive that if you're interested in trying their wines, it's not such a risky proposition to order a few bottles. And if my opinion means anything, I think the wines are freaking amazing.


On our visit, I felt like I was hanging out with friends -- the tasting room staff is smart and casual and the experience was so personal. Thanks to Christopher and Rose! I was trying to limit the number of wines I tasted, but I felt like a kid in a candy store and left with 8 bottles and a stack full of wine notes. Given that, I'm going to do a quick rundown of each wine, not my regular detail, and give you the gist of how amazing each was...


Wine 1: 2008 Pinot Gris, Anderson Valley
Price:
$19
Color: This wine had no skin contact and no barrel aging, so it was nearly colorless. It looked like water!
Smell:
The nose was so fragrant -- like nectarines, orange blossoms, yellow apples and white flowers with a little bit of almond.
Taste: It was super fruit forward but also really dry. A perfect blend of nectarine, sour apple, and a touch of almond nuttiness with a snappy clean finish.
Drink or down the sink?:
Drink. An absolutely delicious wine. Fruity but still restrained. I loved it.

Wine 2: 2008 Gewurztraminer, Estate Bottled

Price:
$19
Color:
It was like the Pinot Gris in that the wine was pale and nearly colorless. It had a little meat on the legs due to higher alcohol, but not a rich gold like many Gewurztraminers.
Smell: Typical for Gewurz, the wine was like a bowl of ripe peaches but in a bath of spicy orange tea. The wine also smelled like Chinese lychee too.
Taste: WOW! A lush yet dry wine, it was like apples, lime, pineapple, and lychee. It had very low acid but wasn't flabby -- just super silky. I could sip this all day long.
Drink or down the sink?:
I remembered this as the best US Gewurztraminers I've ever had. It retains the crown. Outstanding wine. Outstanding.

Wine 3: 2009 Riesling, Anderson Valley

Price: $18
Color: Like the Pinot Gris and the Gewurztraminer, the lack of skin contact goes a long way. This wine was colorless.
Smell: This wasn't a real blockbuster. Slight pear and apple aromas were present, but not much else.
Taste:
This is a very dry Riesling, which I loved. It was simple -- those pear and apple aromas were fresh and clean in my mouth. There was a slight mineral tang and good acid too.
Drink or down the sink?: Drink. I love a dry Riesling and this is a great one for sipping. It would be terrific with spicy Chinese or Thai for sure.

Wine 4: 2007 Pinot Noir, Anderson Valley

Price:
$19
Color: Just the color I like to see in a Pinot -- a light garnet to pinkish color, but not dark and rich. Dark Pinot Noir scares me -- it means that it's overripe or the winemaker has extracted too much color from the skin...probably with some bitter tannins for good measure.
Smell:
Totally what I'd expect from a Pinot Noir -- a combination of fresh berries and dirt with a touch of rock and minerals. This tasted like raspberries and cherries ground up in some gravel -- in a good way.
Taste:
This wine was bone dry so I felt you could really taste the berry flavors clearly and how they were complemented by the mineral quality. The lack of oak on the wine made the fruit the star here.
Drink or down the sink?:
Drink. A great wine if you want to taste what the Pinot Noir grape *really* tastes like.

Wine 4: 2007 Pinot Noir Methode a l'Ancienne (85% estate grown fruit)*

Price: $29
Color:
This was a rich ruby color, but still pink and light -- still the right color for Pinot in my opinion.
Smell: Similar to the first Pinot but with the berry and cherry flavors serving as a backbone to the richer dirt and dusty road characters. This was a DIRTY smelling wine.
Taste:
Like the smell, there was a less pronounced berry flavor and more flavors from the soil (dirt) and light oak treatment (about 1/3 of the juice went into new French oak barrels, which gives the flavors I'm about to describe). From the oak, caramel, cloves, and a light smokiness flowed through the wine giving it lots of complexity.
Drink or down the sink?:
I love me a dirty wine. This was unbelievably good. Not overdone, not too fruity, and lots of complex earthy flavors. This is why I love Navarro.

*Note: For comparison, we also tried the 2006 version of this wine. It was completely different! More like rhubarb, brown sugar, cinnamon, and iron than the smoky, mineral quality of the 2007, it was like trying a wine from a different producer and from a different place. Still delicious, but I preferred the 2007.


Whereas the previous wines were all grown around Navarro in the cool Anderson Valley and on the east side of the mountain divide, the Zin and the Syrah were grown in the hotter Ukiah Valley, which provides the right amount of bright sun and heat to make these sun worshiping grapes ripen to their best potential.


Wine 5: 2007 Zinfandel, Mendocino
Price:
$19
Color:
Yup, this was from a sunny area. Plum colored with dark, rich ruby tones, I expected lots of flavor from a wine of this depth.
Smell:
This was just dripping with ripe fruit. It smelled like blueberry preserves or plum pie. Dark berries and cinnamon -- who could ask for more?
Taste:
Tasted just like it smelled, only fresher. I got the sensation of pulling a raspberry off the vine and eating it. It was like a blueberry coffee cake, only with pretty strong mouth-drying tannins and kind of high alcohol (14.7%).
Drink or down the sink?:
This was the best Zinfandel I had while in California this time around. Even after touring the Dry Creek Valley, which is famous for Zin, and trying some outstanding examples, this little $19 bottle took the cake. Fierce.

Wine 6: 2005 Syrah, Mendocino

Price: $25
Color:
This wine was showing it's age -- it had a dark ruby center, but it was lightening up to a brownish, garnet rim (remember, red wines lighten with age -- think of it like grey hair on people).
Smell:
This was a little medicinal and very leathery. It smelled like wet potting soil too, and like minerals.
Taste:
There was a nice sour cherry note with some coffee flavor and a smoky, toasted thing too. Although 5 years old, the wine was still raging with strong mouth-puckering tannins.
Drink or down the sink?: I can't endorse down the sink, but I will say this was my least favorite of the bunch. With the lineup as strong as it is from Navarro, it's hard to compete. This is a good, but not great wine...which is ok when it seems like everything else that comes out of this place is liquid joy!

Thanks to Navarro for being down to earth, caring about wine so much, and making affordable juice for us all to love. I highly encourage a visit up Rte 128 to their Philo tasting room -- your wallet will be lighter for the trip, but your palate richer for the experience!!!
Readmore »»